JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)June 28, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Wilson Ruiz Orejuela

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Interpuesto Contra El Auto Del 20 De Mayo De 2005 De Rechazo De La Demanda. Confirma En Todas Sus Partes El Auto Del 20 De Mayo De 2005
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Improcedencia por cuestionar consideraciones del auto inadmisorio
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes el Auto del 20 de mayo de 2005, proferido por el despacho del Magistrado Sustanciador en el proceso D-5747, Rodrigo Escobar Gil, mediante el cual se rechazo la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Wilson Ruiz Orejuela, en contra del articulo 132 de la Ley 812 de 2003 "por la cual se aprueba el Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2003-2006, hacia un Estado comunitario".
  2. Segundo. ARCHIVESE el expediente. en lo relativo al art. 132 Ley 812.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.